![]() (I tried using a separate COM port PTT system, but I found that you have to use the PTT via the USB cable, or the TX tones don't get sent to the 101) I think the use of FSK is not recommended nowadays, as long as your AFSK TX signal is good quality. The best RTTY results Ive ever had is a good old fashioned PK232 feeding in/out via back of the. All of these RTTY software packages will work with the 101's USB link, but need some setting up. It seems as though software decoders sometimes are lacking. 2Tone gives excellent decoding under difficult conditions - it helps if you have more than one decoder running. DXlog is very good software now, and I think they allow other decoders now in parallel on RX. ![]() For RTTY contesting, at the moment I use N1MM+ with MMTTY, FLdigi and 2Tone, or alternatively DXlog with MMVARI. You generate the AFSK TX tones with one program, and because the RX audio from the 101 is passing through the same sound card, as many other decoders as you like can access the RX tones simultaneously. However the best plan is to run MMTTY in one window, and a newer program like FLdigi, 2Tone, MixW, Gritty, etc in second or third RX windows. MMTTY and MMVARI are old programs - newer RTTY software can offer improved decoding under noisy condx, QSB, flutter, etc. Hi Rich I guess it depends if you want to use RTTY for contesting or DXing - however I would guess 95% of RTTY use in 2020 is now during contests.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |